|
53 yo male, complaining of acute abdominal
pain, with no other symptoms. Physical examination normal. CTScan reveals
the presence of a mass, embedded in the wall of the small bowell in the
pelvic area. Endoscopies were negative. Surgical excision of the tumor
with wide margins is performed.
 
The specimen opened shows a large mass
lobulated, firm, extending in the mesentery, mesuring 7 cm. A close up
on the mucosae adherent to the tumor reveals a rounded ulcer on top of
the lesion distorting the mucosal features.

The section along the ulcer demonstrates
a yellowish mass adherent to the muscularis, extending in the mesenteric
fat with pushing margins, and centered by large areas of necrosis and
hemorrhage.
 
Low power views on the mucosal and
serosal limits of the tumor.
 
Medium power views show variation in
cellularity, with areas of hyaline changes.
 
Fascicular pattern of a spindle cell
proliferation, moderately cellular, with slight atypia.
 
Mitotic figures count around 4 to 5
per 10 HPF in some areas.

The tumor cells express strong positivity
to smooth muscle actin, and are negative to Desmin, S100.
DIAGNOSIS:
Size, location, mitotic count, and necrosis
of this stromal tumor, are in favor of a malignant or at least of indeterminate
malignant potential.
STROMAL TUMORS
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) constitute
the largest category of primary nonepithelial neoplasms of the stomach
and small bowel. They arise from cells located in the walls of the organ
and show a remarkable variability in their differentiation pathways. This
has resulted in a considerable degree of confusion in their interpretation,
which if anything it has exacerbated recently. For many years, they were
all regarded as being basically of smooth muscle nature and designated
as leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas when composed of spindle cells and as
benign or malignant leiomyoblastomas (or epithelioid leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas,
respectively) when composed of epithelioid cells. The many immunohistochemical
and ultrastructural studies that have been carried out by numerous authors
in recent times have shown a much more complex picture. Acknowledging
the fact that additional work needs to be done to fully understand these
neoplasms, it would seem that they can be divided into four major categories
on the basis of their phenotypical features:
I-Tumors showing differentiation towards
smooth muscle cells, as evidenced immunohistochemically by the expression
of smooth muscle actin and desmin and ultrastructurally by the presence
of pinocytotic vesicles, subplasmalemmal dense patches, and cytoplasmic
microfilaments; with focal densities. These tumors constitute by far the
largest category. Theoretically, they could arise from the muscularis
propria, muscularis mucosae, or vessel-related smooth muscle cells.
2-Tumors showing apparent differentiation
toward neural elements, mainly determined by the presence on ultrastructural
examination of neuron-like features such as long cytoplasmic processes
resembling axons joined by primitive cell junctions, scattered microtubules
consistentwith neurotubules, and dense-core neurosecretory type granules.
These features have been likened to those of neural cells in the autonomic
myenteric plexus and the tumors consequently designated as gastrointestinal
autonomic nerve tumors (GANs), myenteric plexus tumors, or plexosarcomas.
Curiously, immunohistochernical support for this interpretation has been
meager, in the sense that neural/neuroendocrine markers such as neurofilaments,
chromogranin, and synaptophysin have been generally absent and that the
only markers in this category showing consistently positive results have
been the less reliable neuron-specific enolase and/or S-100 protein. These
tumors, which by definition lack markers of smooth muscle differentiation,
constitute the second largest group. What relation they may have with
the exceptional reported cases of gastric schwannoma is not clear. Suffice
it to say that as a group GANs show ultrastructural features consistent
with neuronal rather than schwannian derivation.
3-Tumors showing dual differentiation
toward smooth muscle and neural elements, defined as per the criteria
previously listed. These are the less common members of this family.
4-Tumors lacking differentiation toward
either cell type, even after exhaustive immunohistochernical and ultrastructural
probing. Some authors use the term GIST in a more restricted sense only
for this particular group, which is almost as unusual as the third. Interestingly,
a high percentage of tumors in this "uncommitted" category show
immunoreactivity for CD34.
Some GISTs are already clearly identifiable
as of smooth muscle nature at the hematoxylin-eosin level, in that they
look similar to their counterparts in the uterus, esophagus, rectum, and
other sites. This is nearly always the case with the small and sometimes
multiple subserosal neoplasms that are seen frequently as incidental findings
at autopsy or in stomachs removed for other reasons. For many of the clinically
apparent tumors, however, the prediction concerning which of these four
categories they will belong to is notoriously difficult to make. Spindle
tumor cells with acidophilic fibrillary cytoplasm and the presence of
cytoplasmic vacuoles at both ends of the nucleus should suggest smooth
muscle differentiation. An epithelioid appearance is also more likely
to be associated with evidence of smooth muscle differentiation, but many
exceptions occur. This particular morphology is defined by the presence
of round to polygonal cells with central nucleus and a usually abundant
acidophilic or clear cytoplasm; the latter is regarded as an artifact
of fixation. A prominent myxoid matrix may be present in between the tumor
cells. Tumors with features of neural differentiation are generally composed
of spindle (but sometimes epithelioid) cells growing in the form of fascicles,
palisades, and whorls. Deposition of amorphous eosinophilic extracellular
collections of abnormal collagen referred to as skenoid fibers is generally
associated with neural differentiation. Features such as degree of cellularity,
presence of large cells with bizarre hyperchromatic nuclei, marked diffuse
vascularity, and nuclear palisading are of no help in this regard. Conventional
special stains such as Masson's trichrome or Mallory's phosphotungstic
acid-hematoxylin are also uninformative as a rule. In the final analysis,
the categorization of many of these tumors is largely dependent on the
results provided by the special studies previously enumerated.
An issue of obvious practical importance
is the determination of malignancy in these tumors. This shows
a statistical association with the pattern of differentiation. All tumors
in category 2 (GANs) are currently regarded as malignant, even
if those containing numerous skenoidfibers (and referred to as myenteric
tumors) seem to behave in a less aggressive fashion. It would seern that
the rare tumors in categories 3 and 4 are also to be regarded as malignant
or potentially malignant. Along those lines, all of the GISTs in one series
that were positive only for vimentin, had a rather primitive phenotype
were malignant. By contrast, those tumors belonging to the first and largest
category (those with smooth. muscle features) are divided into benign,
borderline, and malignant, independendy of whether they are composed
of spindle or epithelioid cells. Features favoring malignancy are size
larger than 5 cm, necrosis, hemorrhage, hypercellulafity, nuclear
atypia, and mitotic activity. In tumors composed of epithelioid cells,
additional features suggestive of malignancy are location in the proximal
anterior wall (rather than the antropyloric region), small tumor cell
size, alveolar arrangement, and paucity of reticulin fibers. Although
the correlation between mitotic activity and behavior is not nearly as
good as for uterine smooth muscle tumors, it remains one of the most powerful
predictors.
By combining this parameter with size, Amin
et al.divided their cases into three groups: (1) benign:
mitotic count less than 5 X 50 HPF, tumor size 5 cm or less; (2)
borderline, same mitotic number but tumor size larger dian 5
cm; (3) malignant: mitotic count greater than
5 X 50 HPF, any size tumor. None of their nineteen benign or sixteen borderline
tumors recurred or metastasized, whereas seven of ten malignant tumors
metastasized, and one recurred. These authors found a good correlation
between mitotic count and PCNA index, and others have reported a similarly
good correlation between PCNA index and prognosis.
Clinically, the most common symptoms
associated with GISTs are abdominal pain and melena. The large majority
of the cases occur in adults; however, they have also been reported in
children, and most of these have been malignant. In terms of location,
most clinically apparent GISTs are located in the pars media (40%) of
the stomach, followed by the antrum (25%). Although 20% occur near the
pylorus, obstruction is rare. About 60% are submucosal and grow toward
the lumen, where they make a smooth projection. In time, a central ulceration
may occur (more commonly with the malignant tumors),that may penetrate
into the tumor mass and result in hernatemesis.The smooth outline of the
tumor and the central niche result in a highly characteristic radiographic
appearance. About 30% of the tumors are subserosal, and the other is intramural.
Grossly, the better differentiated smooth muscle tumors have a very typical
appearance. On section, they are well-circumscribed and have a smooth,
lobulated, or whorled-silk appearance. An hourglass defect may occur at
the cardia or pylorus if the tumor encircles the stomach. Prominent fibrohyaline
arm may be present, and they may undergo calcification.
The treatement consists of excision
of the tumor with a good margin of normal tissue. Depending on the site
and size of the tumor, this may involve a subtotal gastrectomy. Sirnple
enucleation of the tumor should be discouraged. Wide resection of lymph
node areas is not indicated because of the extreme rarity of lymph
node metastases. The type of extent of the operation are more dependent
on the tumor size and location than its subclassification in the GIST
group.
The most common site of metastases of malignant
GISTs are the liver, peritoneum, and lungs. These metastases can
develop as long as 30 years after the removal of the primary tumor. In
one series, the overall 5-year survival rate for GISTs classified as gastric
leiomyosarcoma was 56%; large turnor.size, invasion of adjacent organs,
and high microscopic grade affected the prognosis adversely. The assignment
of a microscopic grade largely depends on mitotic
count and is a powerful prognostic indicator.
The presence of neural features along GAN lines is associated with a very
aggressive behavior, but this goes pari passu with the high mitotic: activity
that characterizes these tumors. Determination of DNA ploidy by flow cytometry
can distinguish benign from malignant GISTs, but it provides information
of prognostic value in the subgroup of malignant tumors.
SMALL BOWEL STROMAL TUMORS
Stromal. tumors may occur in any portion
of the bowel, but those exhibiting smooth muscle differentiation (which
are the majority) predominate distally. Thus a review of 421 cases
reported as small bowel leiomyosarcoma. revealed that 10% were in the
duodenum, 37% in the jejunum, and 53% in the ileum.
The large majority of GISTs of the small
bowel are solitary, but cases presenting as multiple nodules in
small and large bowel have been reported. Grossly, they are fairly well
circumscribed, and their pattern of growth may be predominantly submucosal
or subserosal. The former may develop a central ulcer niche similar to
that more often seen in their gastric counterparts. Those growing toward
the mesentery can reach huge dimensions. The symptoms depend on
their growth pattern. They may be detected because of occult or massive
bleeding, pain, obstruction, intussusception, or perforation . Those
located in the pelvis often have clinical and radiographic features resembling
ovarian neoplasms. Exceptional cases have been associated with evidence
of HCG production.
As in the stomach, these tumors may show
immunohistochemical/ultrastructural evidence of differentiation towards
smooth muscle elements (the majority), neural elements (the second
largest group), both, or neither. Those exhibiting features of neural
differentiation have been the subject of a particularly close scrutiny
in recent years. This includes the subset of tumors containing skenoid
fibers, which allegedly are less aggressive than the others. A myenteric
plexus origin has been proposed for them, even if the features of the
tumor cells do not exactly match any of the well-characterized component
of this structure. However, some interesting similarities with the interstitial
cell of Cajal exist. The percentage of tumor of uncommitted type may be
higher in the small bowel than in stomach, as suggested by the large number
of cases showing immunoreactivity for CD34; this, however, may be associated
with immunoreactivity for smooth muscle markers.
Also in analogy with the stomach, some relationship
exists between these differentiation patterns and the clinicopathologic
features. Thus multiple stromal nodules involving both small and large
bowel are always obviously muscular in nature ("leiomyomatosis").
Those tumors occurring in the AIDS-affected population also have smooth
muscle features and often exhibit a close microscopic relationship w ith
vessel walls, suggesting an origin from them. The percentage of tumors
with epithelioid morphology is smaller than in GISTs located in the stomach.
The subdivision into benign, borderline, and malignant tumors is based
on criteria similar to those used for their gastric counterparts. Any
small bowel GIST should be regarded as malignant or at least of indeterminate
malignant potential if any of these features
is present: large size (over 5 cm), fresh tumor necrosis,
extensive hemorrhage unrelated to surgery, extreme cellularity,
marked atypia, or high mitotic activity (five or more mitoses per ten
high-power fields). Of these, high mitotic activity is the single
most important microscopic feature, both to place tumors in a malignant
category and to further divide them into low and high grades. Among GISTs
of the duodenum, those composed of large cells and having an organoid
pattern are predictably benign, whereas highly cellular tumors with small
cells and little or no organoid pattern are malignant. It should also
be kept in mind that the percentage of malignant cases is higher in,GIST
of small bowel than in those for the stomach.
Malignant GISTs of small bowel may invade
adjacent structures such as the pancreas by direct extension. They also
tend to invade the bloodstream and metastasize distantly. Staging, microscopic
grading, and DNA ploidy have been shown to correlate with prognosis. Of
twenty patients studied by Ranchod and Kempson, fifteen developed metastases
(usually to the liver and peritoneum), and four others developed intra-abdominal
tumor with prominent retroperitoneal spread; only one patient was found
to be alive and free of disease at the time of the last follow-up.
(Ref. Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. 8ed.)
|